Skip to content
GREEN FUTURETECH.
Explore

GFT instruments / Performance architecture

Give the strategy
an owner on the line.

Turn a strategic outcome into a controllable line measure, a target, an owner and a review rhythm. Test a supervisor's total workload across the six KPI families.

Operate the instrumentIllustrative cascade from the programme default. Schematic, not a factory.

01 / An instrument for the decision

How does a strategic outcome become a number a line supervisor controls?

Start a workshop

One strategy, six families

Hourly output against target120 garments/hourdailyOwner: Sewing line supervisor (focused)Daily line huddle. Illustrative target.

Sewing line supervisor carries five measures across all families. The design limit is reached. A new measure needs a deliberate replacement or a different accountable owner.

Illustrative workshop: the families follow GFT's Cameroon textile programme. Every target and role allocation is an assumption, not measured factory performance. Presets replace current B and preserve saved A.

02 / Follow one strategy down one branch

Strategy becomes a number at the end of each branch.

01 / 05

Start from the outcome.

The programme design groups strategy into six families so that nothing important is missed and nothing unimportant is measured.

Strategy, six outcomes

02 / 05

Name the family and its vocabulary.

Each family carries a vocabulary from the programme. For production: OEE, throughput, first-pass yield.

Family, programme vocabulary

03 / 05

Turn the vocabulary into a line measure.

Choose a definition the team could reproduce tomorrow, with one target in its own unit. Units are never added together, and every target here is illustrative.

Measure, target, unit

04 / 05

Give it one owner, then count.

Every measure has one accountable owner. Sewing line supervisor ends up with 5 measures across 4 families, which is the design limit.

Owner load = count

05 / 05

Fix a rhythm for the response.

A daily huddle fixes today, a weekly review corrects the week and a monthly review sets the plan. A review cadence is not a sampling interval.

Cadence, review

03 / Give a line number a purpose

Add a controllable measure.

Use a definition your team could reproduce tomorrow. The target is a proposed planning value. This builder stores assignments, not actual readings or a trend. Targets accept zero to ten thousand in the entered unit; these are interface bounds.

Adding to Production. The proposed measure would bring this owner to six measures.

Existing targets remain as entered. Editing the draft does not change B until you add or update the measure.

Family stripe chart · click or hover a bar to inspect

Every measure, by family.

Production 2Quality 1Delivery 2Cost 1People 2Sustainability 3
ProductionEnough good garments2 measures

Programme vocabulary: OEE, throughput, first-pass yield.

  • Hourly output against targetdaily

    Target120 garments/hour

    Owner: Sewing line supervisor

  • First-pass yielddaily

    Target95 %

    Owner: Sewing line supervisor

QualityQuality that wins orders1 measures

Programme vocabulary: Defects per hundred units, right-first-time.

  • Defects per hundred unitsdaily

    Target3 defects/100 units

    Owner: Sewing line supervisor

DeliveryReliable delivery2 measures

Programme vocabulary: On-time-in-full, lead time.

  • On-time-in-fullweekly

    Target95 %

    Owner: Dispatch lead

  • Order lead timeweekly

    Target7 days

    Owner: Planning lead

CostCost under control1 measures

Programme vocabulary: Cost per garment, labour cost per unit.

  • Labour hours per garmentdaily

    Target0.25 hours/garment

    Owner: Sewing line supervisor

PeopleA present, improving team2 measures

Programme vocabulary: Absenteeism, skill-matrix coverage.

  • Attendancedaily

    Target95 %

    Owner: Sewing line supervisor

  • Skill-matrix coverageweekly

    Target80 %

    Owner: Training lead

SustainabilityMeasured sustainability3 measures

Programme vocabulary: Water, energy and waste per unit.

  • Water per garmentmonthly

    Target10 litres/garment

    Owner: Utilities lead

  • Energy per garmentmonthly

    Target0.5 kWh/garment

    Owner: Utilities lead

  • Waste per garmentmonthly

    Target0.08 kg/garment

    Owner: Utilities lead

04 / Count the work, across the whole tree

A new family does not create more capacity.

The five-number guidance applies to line supervisors. The heddles use that reference for every role so allocation is visible. A planner or plant manager may have a different span; review their capacity separately.

A named owner still needs the means to act.

A low count does not prove that the owner has authority, time, training or reliable data. Agree the line and product boundary, who records the reading and how corrections are approved before adopting the cascade.

Water intensity is sensitive to process scope, batch size and shared utilities. Labour hours per garment need one treatment of direct and indirect work. Delivery reliability needs an agreed due date and completeness test.

It does not validate unit semantics, decide whether higher or lower is better, calculate actual KPI values or establish a financial or environmental benefit. There is no alert and no link to a production system. The sixty-measure limit keeps the tree readable; it does not prescribe plant-wide architecture.

Sewing line supervisor5 / 5
  1. Hourly output against target120 garments/hour
  2. First-pass yield95 %
  3. Defects per hundred units3 defects/100 units
  4. Labour hours per garment0.25 hours/garment
  5. Attendance95 %

AuthorityTimeTraining or dataUnproven by the count

Utilities lead3 / 5
  1. Water per garment10 litres/garmentProcess scope · batch size · shared utilities
  2. Energy per garment0.5 kWh/garment
  3. Waste per garment0.08 kg/garment
Dispatch lead1 / 5
  1. On-time-in-full95 %
Planning lead1 / 5
  1. Order lead time7 days
Training lead1 / 5
  1. Skill-matrix coverage80 %

Sewing line supervisor · 5 of 5 slots filled · 0 open · 0 above rule · Measures: Hourly output against target (120 garments/hour) · First-pass yield (95 %) · Defects per hundred units (3 defects/100 units) · Labour hours per garment (0.25 hours/garment) · Attendance (95 %)

0 owners above rule

Reconciliation: 11 measures = 11 family assignments = 11 owner assignments = 11 cadence assignments.

05 / Keep a decision trail

Compare assignments before adding work.

Save the current assignment as A, then change B with a preset or the editor. Hollow eyes are A, solid eyes are B.

A 11 measures · supervisor 5 against B 11 · supervisor 7 · +2 above rule

Preview B
Preview B, not applied
  • Sewing line supervisorABA 5B 7+2
  • Utilities leadABA 3B 3no change
  • Dispatch leadABA 1B 0-1
  • Planning leadABA 1B 0-1
  • Training leadABA 1B 1no change

A: reference A, the programme defaultB: overloaded preset, previewedFive-measure rule

The link contains B and saved A as readable text. Anyone with the link can read the assignments. Use role names rather than personal or confidential information. Nothing is sent to a server.

06 / Method, reproducible by hand

Count assignments. Keep unlike units apart.

The model is an assignment register. Each record has a strategic family, a line measure, a numeric target with a unit, one owner and one review cadence. It never combines yield, water and labour into a single score.

Units of the three illustrative targets

Drag a tag into the sum collector below, or press Enter on it

Sum collector

No sum. The units differ, so the three targets stay apart. The model counts 3 assignments, not 245 of anything.

245 garments/hour. Like units on one agreed boundary may be added. Illustrative values; the cascade still stores them as separate targets.

07 / Check the default by hand

Eleven measures, counted three ways, stay eleven.

5measures for the sewing line supervisor

Load first. The supervisor's 5 measures fill the five eyes: 0 slots remain, 0 excess. Adding downtime makes six and one excess.

11measures, summed by family

By family: production 2, quality 1, delivery 2, cost 1, people 2 and sustainability 3.

11measures, summed by owner

By owner. Reassigning it changes responsibility, not the total.

11 = 11 = 11by family, by owner, by cadence

By cadence. Each measure has exactly one family, one owner and one rhythm, so every count reconciles.

  1. Owner load = count of measures assigned to Sewing line supervisor = 5
  2. Remaining slots = max(0, 5 minus 5) = 0
  3. Excess = max(0, 5 minus 5) = 0
  4. Total = 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 2 + 3 = 11 (by family)
  5. Total = 5 + 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 11 (by owner)
  6. Total = 5 + 3 + 3 = 11 (by cadence)
  7. 11 measures = 11 family assignments = 11 owner assignments = 11 cadence assignments.

08 / Assumptions, initial example only

The framework is sourced. Targets are proposed.

The six families, vocabulary and review rhythms follow the performance-management design in GFT's Cameroon textile programme, prepared 31 January 2024. Every numeric target and role allocation below is an illustrative workshop input, not a programme operating target or an industry benchmark.

8sourced

11proposed

Showing 19 of 19

Show rows that are
Family
Showing 19 of 19 rows. Rows: both sourced and proposed. Family: all. Every numeric target is illustrative.
Value or targetStatus and basis
Production familyProductionOEE, throughput, first-pass yieldNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
Quality familyQualityDefects per hundred units, right-first-timeNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
Delivery familyDeliveryOn-time-in-full, lead timeNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
Cost familyCostCost per garment, labour cost per unitNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
People familyPeopleAbsenteeism, skill-matrix coverageNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
Sustainability familySustainabilityWater, energy and waste per unitNot assigned in the frameworkSourced Family vocabulary, performance-management design, page 8.
Five-number design guidanceAllFive measures per supervisorLine supervisorSourced Design guidance, page 6. Not a statistically validated law.
Three review rhythmsAllDaily, weekly, monthlyHuddle, plant review, planning reviewSourced Management cadence, page 12.
Hourly output against targetProduction120 garments/hourSewing line supervisor, daily · load 5/5Proposed Round workshop example for an hourly line board; not capacity evidence.
First-pass yieldProduction95 %Sewing line supervisor, daily · load 5/5Proposed Workshop example of a high-is-better yield target; not a promised result.
Defects per hundred unitsQuality3 defects/100 unitsSewing line supervisor, daily · load 5/5Proposed Workshop example of a low-is-better defect frequency; defects are not defective garments.
On-time-in-fullDelivery95 %Dispatch lead, weekly · load 1/5Proposed Workshop example for order reliability; completeness and due-date rules must be defined.
Order lead timeDelivery7 daysPlanning lead, weekly · load 1/5Proposed Workshop example measured in elapsed days; calendar boundary must be agreed.
Labour hours per garmentCost0.25 hours/garmentSewing line supervisor, daily · load 5/5Proposed Workshop example dividing recorded labour hours by garments; not wage cost.
AttendancePeople95 %Sewing line supervisor, daily · load 5/5Proposed Workshop example for presence, using attendance rather than its absence complement.
Skill-matrix coveragePeople80 %Training lead, weekly · load 1/5Proposed Workshop example for qualified roles against required roles; not training attendance.
Water per garmentSustainability10 litres/garmentUtilities lead, monthly · load 3/5Proposed Workshop example of allocated water use per garment; process boundary is undefined.
Energy per garmentSustainability0.5 kWh/garmentUtilities lead, monthly · load 3/5Proposed Workshop example of allocated energy use per garment; not a carbon factor.
Waste per garmentSustainability0.08 kg/garmentUtilities lead, monthly · load 3/5Proposed Workshop example of measured waste mass per garment; disposal route is unspecified.

This page carries no client identity, commercial results or factory observations. Targets keep their entered units and are never added together or sorted across units. Editor defaults, downtime of thirty minutes per shift and daily review by the focused supervisor, are also illustrative. Neither preset represents an actual organisation.

09 / Continue the engineering

Connect the assignment to a working data spine.

Pick a station and the threads light up to it

01 / Define · One agreed definition per measure, with its boundary.

Write the unit, the time window and what is excluded, so that two people reading the same shift reach the same number.

02 / Capture · A named person records the reading at the line.

Decide whether the reading is a count, a timestamp or a gauge value, and where it is written first.

03 / Check · A rule catches a missing or impossible value.

A defect count below zero, or attendance above the roster, is stopped before it reaches the board.

04 / Share · One view that every owner reads.

The huddle, the plant review and the planning review look at the same numbers, cut to their own cadence.

05 / Review · The cadence decides who acts, and by when.

A reading that departs from plan needs an agreed response, not only a flag.

Illustrative schematic of a data spine. It is not a GFT system, a customer deployment or a product claim.

10 / Use the result in its boundary

A short list makes room for action.

The cascade is a design review, not evidence that a factory is performing well. Take the proposed assignment to the people who will collect the data and act on it. Click a family to leave it out of the recount.

5of five for Sewing line supervisor

Sewing line supervisor carries 5 of 5 measures with 6 of 6 families counted. A what-if view; the scenario is unchanged.

Each measure belongs to one family, one owner and one review cadence. Owner load is the count across every family. Remaining slots = max(0, 5 minus load); excess = max(0, load minus 5). Targets keep their entered units and are never added together.

Owner names are trimmed before grouping, so keep spelling and capitalisation consistent: the builder cannot tell whether two differently named roles are the same person. A daily measure may need hourly capture, and a monthly intensity still needs an agreed production denominator.

GFT's Cameroon textile programme, performance-management design, prepared 31 January 2024, framework, architecture and cadence. Targets and role allocations shown here are illustrative.

Framework pages: design guidance (page 6), family architecture (page 8) and management cadence (page 12). The programme documents are not published.

Ask which reading will change a decision on the next shift. If nobody can name it, revise the measure. Use the output to structure a conversation between the factory manager, engineer and team supervisor; a concise cascade should remove reporting work as well as make responsibility visible.

A planning aid. Not investment, legal or tax advice. Verify inputs and boundaries before an operational decision.

  1. Hourly output against target120 garments/hourDailyResponse: to agree
  2. First-pass yield95 %DailyResponse: to agree
  3. Defects per hundred units3 defects/100 unitsDailyResponse: to agree
  4. Labour hours per garment0.25 hours/garmentDailyResponse: to agree
  5. Attendance95 %DailyResponse: to agree

Assign the response as well as the number. A target needs a measurement boundary, an accountable owner and an agreed response when the result departs from plan. A balanced count cannot establish those conditions by itself.

Five threads · next instrumentCarry the 5-of-5 supervisor shortlist into the measurement architecture.

Find a thread.

Type to search.