A GFT programme defaults, not saved
Hover or tap the field. Now: 65.0% utilisation, 1.00× wage, 105,712,350 XAF a month.
GFT instruments / Garment economics
A garment must carry
more than its thread.
Test a Cameroonian garment line against its operating breakeven. Explore utilisation, wages, yield and price in a transparent, illustrative monthly model.
01 / AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE DECISION
Can the line clear breakeven, and which variable decides it?
The scenario covers its modelled operating costs. Breakeven is 22.6% utilisation, compared with 65.0% entered. Material per good garment has the largest tested sensitivity span. This is a local ten-percent test, not a forecast or a recommendation to cut wages.
Find the boundary before the limit.
Utilisation runs across, wage multiplier up. Tap the field to place your operating point.
Cursor: 65.0% utilisation, 1.00× wage. Result: 105,712,350 XAF.
Dashed contours mark −0.5×, 1× and 2× monthly fixed cost. The levels are illustrative; their positions follow your inputs.
02 / UNIT-COST BRIDGE
Every cost must cross the same unit.
Five steps add up to the price a garment must beat. Select a bar to read its share and the running total.
4.9% of the 3,500 XAF net price.
Read the reconciliation
Revenue = materials + logistics + payroll + fixed overhead + operating result. Reconciliation residual: 0 XAF.
- After materials
- After labour
- After overhead
- After logistics
- Total
03 / LOCAL SENSITIVITY
Measure which assumption moves the result.
Each input moves alone by the swing you choose. Left means a lower monthly result. Select a bar to read it.
Change in monthly result for a 10% swing in this input, all others fixed.
| Input tested | Range tested | Low effect | High effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material per good garment | 1,980 → 2,420 | 33,962,500 | -33,962,500 |
| High selling price | 3,780 → 4,620 | -32,418,750 | 32,418,750 |
| Low selling price | 2,520 → 3,080 | -21,612,500 | 21,612,500 |
| Utilisation | 58.5% → 71.5% | -16,209,375 | 16,209,375 |
| Annual nameplate | 2,700,000 → 3,300,000 | -16,209,375 | 16,209,375 |
| First-pass yield | 85.5% → 100.0% | -16,209,375 | 8,531,250 |
| Logistics per good garment | 225 → 275 | 3,859,375 | -3,859,375 |
| Fixed overhead per month | 27,000,000 → 33,000,000 | 3,000,000 | -3,000,000 |
| Wage multiplier | 0.90× → 1.10× | 2,638,140 | -2,638,140 |
| Direct headcount | 540 → 660 | 2,638,140 | -2,638,140 |
04 / SCENARIO REGISTER
Keep the assumption that changed the decision.
Save the current inputs as A, then move the controls to make B. A link carries both states.
B Live, your current inputs
Hover or focus any metric row in Card A or Card B to compare that line item across both scenarios.
Inputs changed from A: none.
05 / THE METHOD
Contribution carries the fixed commitment.
Materials plus logistics 2,450Contribution C 1,050
UTILISATION OF NAMEPLATE, 0% TO 100%
Count the good garments.
Nameplate divided by twelve, times utilisation, times first-pass yield.
Q = nameplate ÷ 12 × utilisation × yieldPrice each garment's contribution.
Selling price less materials and logistics. Nothing fixed is in it yet.
C = price − (materials + logistics)Charge the fixed commitment.
Payroll and overhead fall due whatever the line makes.
F = wage × multiplier × headcount + overheadRead the result and the threshold.
Where contribution equals the commitment, the line breaks even.
Result = Q × C − F; breakeven = F ÷ (nameplate ÷ 12 × yield × C)
Read the full method boundary
The question starts with accepted output. Annual nameplate is divided into equal months, then multiplied by utilisation and first-pass yield. Utilisation is the share of the annual throughput denominator attempted in the period. First-pass yield is the share accepted without rework. Do not enter OEE again as utilisation if your nameplate already measures good garments; that would count the same quality loss twice.
All money is in CFA franc (XAF). The multiplier scales the historical base wage to explore a planning payroll. It does not automatically add employer contributions, benefits or overtime. Include those costs explicitly in the wage assumption or overhead without counting them twice. Payroll stays fixed as utilisation changes. The model does not infer layoffs, casual employment or shorter paid hours from a lower output setting.
The breakeven equation applies when yield and contribution are positive. A threshold above full utilisation is retained and labelled beyond capacity. A non-positive contribution cannot absorb positive fixed costs at any volume. At zero good output the unit cost is undefined, while the monthly fixed commitment remains payable. Fractions of garments in monthly results are an average planning rate, not literal production counts or shipment instructions.
The cost bridge adds materials, direct labour allocation, fixed-overhead allocation and logistics. Monthly revenue must equal those costs plus the operating result. The reconciliation residual checks the arithmetic; it does not validate the commercial assumptions.
06 / ASSUMPTIONS, STATUS KEPT WITH THE NUMBER
The defaults are a case to interrogate.
One input comes from the programme evidence register. The rest are illustrative or estimated, and none describes an existing GFT factory.
- 01 / SOURCED FROM PROGRAMME EVIDENCE1 INPUT · HISTORICAL R14
- Monthly base wageSourced, R14Default43,969 XAF / person / month
R14, a historical reference effective 23 February 2024, taken from the programme annex. Not a current payroll compliance check.
At its default already. No change.
- 02 / PROGRAMME CAPACITY ESTIMATE1 INPUT · LINE DENOMINATOR
- Annual nameplateEstimateDefault3,000,000 garments / year
Estimate specified for this instrument. A hypothetical line-scale denominator, not an operating GFT factory.
At its default already. No change.
- 03 / ILLUSTRATIVE OPERATING & COMMERCIAL CASE9 INPUTS · SCENARIO BOUNDARY
- UtilisationIllustrativeDefault65.0%
Illustrative operating case. Scheduled throughput, before acceptance at first inspection.
At its default already. No change.
- First-pass yieldIllustrativeDefault95.0%
Illustrative. The share accepted at first inspection without rework.
At its default already. No change.
- Direct headcountIllustrativeDefault600 people
Illustrative staffing case. Every direct worker stays on monthly payroll at any utilisation.
At its default already. No change.
- Wage multiplierIllustrativeDefault1.00×
Illustrative planning multiplier on the R14 base wage. Not a legal wage option.
At its default already. No change.
- Material per good garmentIllustrativeDefault2,200 XAF / good garment
Illustrative net cost per accepted garment. Replace it using the same product, delivery boundary and currency.
At its default already. No change.
- Logistics per good garmentIllustrativeDefault250 XAF / good garment
Illustrative net cost per accepted garment, on the same delivery boundary as materials.
At its default already. No change.
- Fixed overhead per monthIllustrativeDefault30,000,000 XAF / month
Illustrative allocation for the line, excluding the direct payroll counted separately.
At its default already. No change.
- Low selling priceIllustrativeDefault2,800 XAF / good garment
Illustrative negotiation range, low end. Not a buyer quotation.
At its default already. No change.
- High selling priceIllustrativeDefault4,200 XAF / good garment
Illustrative negotiation range, high end. Not a buyer quotation.
At its default already. No change.
THE MODEL STAYS VISIBLE / OPERABLE CHAIN STEPPER
One chain from wage to breakeven.
- × 600
- × 65.0%
- × 95.0%
- × C
- vs F
- F ÷ pool
Monthly base wage from R14, a historical reference effective 23 February 2024. The multiplier and headcount scale it into the fixed commitment.
A 10% swing in monthly base wage changes the monthly result by +2.6m and −2.6m XAF. Breakeven utilisation moves from 21.6% to 23.7%.
ARITHMETIC LEDGER / METHOD EQUATIONS
Three identities connect capacity, unit cost and breakeven.
Good monthly output = annual nameplate ÷ 12 × utilisation × first-pass yield. Unit cost = materials + logistics + (monthly payroll + fixed overhead) ÷ good output. Breakeven utilisation = monthly fixed costs ÷ full-utilisation monthly contribution.
Provenance breakdown (1 sourced · 1 estimate · 9 illustrative)
1 sourced (R14)1 estimate9 illustrative
METHOD SOURCE & BOUNDARY NOTICE
Historical reference and decision qualification.
Historical base wage: R14, WageIndicator, as recorded in the GFT programme annex. Remaining defaults are explicitly illustrative or estimated; see the assumptions register.
Sensitivity changes are 10% by default; the wage map runs from 0.50× to 5.00×. A planning aid. Not investment, legal or tax advice. Verify inputs and boundaries before an operational decision.
07 / LIMITS, THE RESULT NEEDS A MARKET
A surplus is conditional on saleable output.
A positive monthly result on the contribution field still depends on four boundaries: the price band, buyer sell-through, capital items outside operating cost and simultaneous input swings.
The price is your band, not a forecast.
The wedge is breakeven across your own low and high price. It is a range you chose, not a probability.
Every garment must find a buyer.
The model sells all good output in its month. The green lines show breakeven if only 90, 80 or 70 percent sells (illustrative).
Operating breakeven is not payback.
Capital expenditure, debt service, depreciation, tax and working capital sit outside it. A positive cell is not investable cash.
A ranking is local, not causal.
Each bar moves one input alone. Combined changes can reorder it. This is not investment, legal or tax advice.
Read the full limits
The selected price is the low, midpoint or high point of your own net selling-price band. The model assumes every accepted garment sells in the same month at that price. Unsold inventory, customer concentration, currency exposure, payment delays and returns can make cash generation worse than the operating result. No sales pipeline or offtake commitment is implied by a positive cell on the field.
Materials and logistics are entered per good garment. If rejects consume fabric, divide the actual material spend by accepted units before entering that cost. Rework recovery, learning curves, production bottlenecks and step changes in staffing are not represented. Fixed overhead must cover the same factory boundary as headcount and nameplate.
Capital expenditure, debt service, depreciation, tax, working capital and financing charges are excluded. This is operating breakeven, not project payback, debt coverage or investment return. A factory manager can use the field to examine a run plan, an engineer can interrogate the capacity and yield boundary, and an investor can see which unverified assumption deserves diligence. None should read the result as investment, legal or tax advice.
The tornado measures local effects, not causal importance. Each endpoint is clipped to the input domain, and price endpoints cannot cross the opposite end of the price band. Integer staffing and nameplate endpoints are rounded outwards. A zero-valued input has no proportional sensitivity. The sell-through lines are an illustration: unsold garments still carry materials and logistics, and revenue falls in proportion. The plus 20 percent load on the fixed commitment in state three is likewise an illustration of items outside the model, not an estimate of any of them.
Breakeven holds at 80.4% of output sold: at 100% coverage, the line clears its monthly commitment by 105,712,350 XAF.
A positive result still needs an order book.
This model assumes every good garment produced is sold at the selected net price. Verify demand, payroll obligations, purchasing terms and measured line capability before treating an operating surplus as investable cash.
Monthly result at the current operating point. It stays above zero down to 80.4% of good output sold.