Skip to content
GREEN FUTURETECH.
Explore

Research libraryPrint on Demand, Sample on Screen

Chapter 04 of 14 · Part II · Draft web edition

Colour approval belongs to a fabric and process combination

A controlled colour workflow links artwork, fabric preparation, ink, cure and measured output.

Sections
7
Exhibits
4
Minutes
25
Sources
20
EX 16 · Wash retention: Trial A: Uncured heavy pigment 2, Trial B: Low-pretreat DTG 2, Trial C: Qualified recipe 4 (illustrative readiness index (0 to 5))

The cloth is woven from this chapter's 4 exhibits: each weft is one exhibit's own data, normalised; each warp group is a section. The probe reads the exhibit's own value where it crosses. Procedural visualisation, not a measurement.

The chapter as a draft: 7 sections, 2 exhibit wefts, one shuttle.

Lead exhibit · 14LayersillustrativeThe colour chain contains several controlled transforms
Digital preparation and previewWorking colour space and tagg…Calibrated display and ambien…Locked pattern scale and pane…Rasterisation and ink depositionRIP rendering intent and chan…Device linearisation and nozz…Substrate lot and pretreatmen…Fixation and physical verificationDry-heat cure or steam and wa…Conditioned swatch under stan…Spectrophotometric and fastne…

Read-outDigital preparation and preview: Working colour space and tagged artwork, Calibrated display and ambient viewing state, Locked pattern scale and panel placement

Method and source

Illustrative GFT control architecture informed by ICC profile specifications (S0401), ICC display calibration guidance (S22), ISO 13655 colorimetric scope (S14) and Fogra ProcessStandard Digital principles (S21). Not a claim of an installed GFT system or external certification.

Unit: governed workflow layers. Status: illustrative. Sources: S14, S21, S22, S0401. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

The chapter's warpBar: share of the reading · square: an exhibit

Section 4.0 · Opening · 1 min · no exhibit of its own · one movement Go to section ↓

Overture · 1 min

Colour approval in an on-demand apparel operation cannot attach to an isolated digital image or a generic colour code. GFT argues that a valid colour release belongs to a documented combination of base substrate, chemical preparation, ink system, raster image processor configuration, thermal fixation state and physical evaluation condition. When a local apparel maker separates visual design approval from substrate qualification, the screen preview promises a shade, sharpness and durability that the production line has not proved it can deliver. Both digital inkjet routes and rotary screen processes depend on substrate properties, chemical compatibility and fixation conditions to achieve acceptable colour and end-use retention.[S01][S02]

¶ 01 · 2 sources

S01S02

The procedures in this chapter are GFT proposals extending the quality-logging discipline of GFT's Cameroon textile programme into print-on-demand and short-run apparel manufacturing. They do not describe an installed GFT printing facility, a certified laboratory or a completed commercial trial. Where the inherited baseline indicates that about 95 percent of Cameroon's cotton fibre is exported raw and about 5 percent is processed locally, alongside a 50 percent local-processing target by 2030, an apparel service must distinguish between printing on domestically transformed cotton cloth and decorating imported ready-made blanks.[R06][R07] In both cases, physical material qualification and controlled strike-off approval must precede production release.

¶ 02 · 2 sources

alongside a 50 percent local-processing target by 2030R06, R07

R06R07

4.13 min · 6 paragraphs · read with a related exhibit

Base fabric is part of the colour specification

Related · chapter 026 paragraphs step it

Related exhibit 05 · chapter 02Decision mapillustrativeEach service commits stock at a different stage
High validation / shallow makeFull custom manufactureStocked-blank decorationStandard-size roll cut-and-sewUpstream process depth committed →Specification and validation burden →Case A: Light blank D…Case A: Dark blank DT…Case B: Institutional…Case C: Roll-printed…Case C: Made-to-measu…

Read-outCase A: Light blank DTG/DTF: Upstream process depth committed 2, Specification and validation burden 2.2. Quadrant: Stocked-blank decoration

Method and source

Illustrative GFT classification informed by S01, S03 and S15. Horizontal axis scores upstream process depth committed per order (0 = finished blank in stock, 10 = pattern, fabric print and full garment assembly). Vertical axis scores specification and validation burden per order (0 = print file only, 10 = body measurement, pattern adaptation and physical fit verification).

Unit: illustrative index (0 to 10). Status: illustrative. Sources: S01, S03, S15. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

Read this exhibit in its chapter ↗
4.1 · Introduction · paragraph 1 of 6

A digital print file contains pixel values, not textile colour. The physical appearance of a printed motif emerges from the interaction between deposited colourants, auxiliary chemicals and the structure of the receiving cloth. In digital textile printing, ink chemistry must match the fibre class: reactive inks require cellulosic fibres with subsequent steaming and washing, disperse sublimation routes require compatible synthetic polymers, and pigment systems rely on a binder and dry heat fixation across cotton and blended substrates.[S01] Within a single fibre category, rotary and digital printing studies confirm that yarn twist, weave or knit tightness, surface hairiness and prior wet processing alter drop spread, penetration depth and perceived shade depth.[S02]

A local apparel producer cannot treat unprinted white or dyed cloth as a uniform commodity. Two cotton jersey lots that look similar on a rack may carry different spinning oils, optical brighteners, residual alkalinity, mercerisation levels or mechanical finishes. When an aqueous inkjet drop strikes those surfaces, differences in wetting tension and capillary wicking change both fine-line dot gain and solid-area reflectance.[S01][S02] If the factory does not record which fabric lot received the approved print trial, a later batch printed with the same file and machine settings can shift noticeably in hue, saturation or edge definition.

GFT proposes that every substrate entering a print-on-demand or short-run service carry a versioned material passport before colour profiling or customer sampling begins. The passport is an operational control record within the factory performance-management system rather than a marketing certificate, binding the physical roll or blank batch to the parameters governing colour reproduction and dimensional stability.[S12][S15]

  • Supplier and lot identity: Record mill or blank distributor, article code, delivery date, batch or dye-lot identifier and roll or carton numbers.[S21]
  • Verified fibre composition: State declared fibre percentages and require supplier test documentation where pure cotton or a blend is specified.[S01][S02]
  • Construction and areal mass: Document weave or knit structure, yarn count, gauge, width and mass per area, governing ink penetration and pretreatment pick-up.[S01]
  • Preparation and surface finish: Identify bleaching, optical brighteners, dyeing, singeing, mercerisation, enzyme washing or softeners that resist pretreatment and binder adhesion.[S01][S30]
  • Base shade and whiteness baseline: Retain an unprinted cutting and record its visual or instrumental baseline under agreed viewing conditions to detect lot drift.[S14][S21]
  • Thermal and care shrinkage: Record length and width change after curing and intended washing and drying, referencing ISO 3759:2011 and ISO 6330:2021 scopes.[S12][S27]

Keeping these records attached to the fabric lot prevents blaming the printer or operator for a shade shift caused by an unannounced blank substitution. When a service decorates imported T-shirt blanks via direct-to-garment (DTG) or direct-to-film (DTF) routes, the blank manufacturer controls spinning, knitting, scouring and garment dyeing upstream.[S15][S30] Mixing cartons from different upstream production runs alters liquid pretreatment pick-up and heat-press scorching behaviour within the same size run, so mixed lots must be segregated at goods receipt and assigned distinct lot identifiers before prepress release.[S15][S17]

For roll-to-roll cut-and-sew printing, the material passport also connects colour qualification to pattern engineering and marker planning. Reactive printing requires steaming, washing and drying after ink deposition, whereas pigment printing relies on dry heat fixation, so mechanical relaxation through the finishing line differs by route.[S01] A cotton poplin or jersey that contracts during pretreatment drying or conveyor curing changes both its areal density and the geometric scale of the printed motif, requiring colourists and patternmakers to evaluate the same prepared physical cloth.[S12][S17]

4.22 min · 7 paragraphs · read with a related exhibit

A screen image is a conditional preview

In a digital sampling workflow, designers and buyers routinely inspect three-dimensional garment renders or two-dimensional artwork layouts on monitors. That screen review is useful for checking motif arrangement, typography, proportion and general tonal balance, but it cannot serve as an unqualified textile colour standard. A monitor produces colour by emitting light through additive red, green and blue subpixels, whereas a printed textile produces colour by selectively absorbing and scattering incident illumination across a textured fibre assembly.[S14][S22]

Even on the display side of the workflow, screen appearance drifts over time unless the device is actively governed. As the International Color Consortium notes in its display calibration guidance, "Since displays tend to drift over time, periodic calibration is needed to maintain colour performance."[S22] An uncalibrated buyer laptop, tablet or telephone applies unknown brightness, white-point temperature, ambient glare compensation and operating-system tone mapping to the preview file. Approving an emailed render does not define which physical colour was approved.[S22]

¶ 02 · 1 source

S22

Calibrating the studio display sets white point, luminance and tone response curve paired with a display profile so colour-managed software translates document encodings consistently.[S22][S0401] Yet pigment or reactive ink gamuts on cotton fabric do not coincide with standard display spaces: saturated screen greens, deep emissive blues and luminous oranges frequently lie outside the reflective gamut of textile ink sets on unbrightened or matte cellulosic cloth.[S01][S22]

¶ 03 · 3 sources

S22S0401S01

A textile print also exhibits surface micro-geometry and illuminant sensitivity absent from a flat RGB preview. Yarn crowns, interstices and binder films scatter light directionally, and metamerism can make a printed swatch match a target reference under studio daylight lamps while diverging noticeably under warm retail lighting or outdoor sun.[S14] Public standards scopes such as ISO 13655:2017 confirm that colorimetric computation requires explicitly defined spectral measurement and viewing illumination conditions even within graphic arts workflows.[S14]

¶ 04 · 1 source

S14

GFT therefore recommends treating every screen render or soft proof as a conditional layout and palette preview rather than a binding shade contract, stating three distinct approval classes in the quotation and order acceptance form before the buyer pays a deposit:

¶ 05
  1. Non-calibrated buyer devices: Where a customer reviews artwork on their own telephone or computer screen, approval covers graphic layout, spelling, motif scale and approximate colour family only, with an explicit warning that device screens vary and cannot match printed cloth.[S22]
  2. Soft-proof studio reviews: Where a buyer inspects a design on a studio monitor maintained on a logged calibration schedule under controlled ambient light, the review narrows candidate shades for sampling, but shade-critical production release still requires a physical reference.[S21][S22]
  3. Physical swatch and strike-off authority: For institutional uniforms, brand logos, repeat corporate orders or matched multi-garment sets, the binding colour target must be a physical swatch or approved strike-off evaluated under a stated lighting condition.[S02][S21]
List · 3 sources

S22S21S02

Separating these classes protects both the local apparel maker and the customer. Promotional orders may willingly accept approximate screen colour in exchange for rapid turnaround without a couriered strike-off, whereas institutional uniform buyers require repeatable physical shade matching across reorders.[S02] Making the preview boundary explicit in the service contract prevents an economical screen-only workflow from carrying the financial liability of a custom-matched dye lot.

¶ 06 · 1 source

S02

4.33 min · 6 paragraphs · read with a related exhibit

Prepress must preserve scale and placement

Related · chapter 126 paragraphs step it

Related exhibit 48 · chapter 12Decision mapillustrativeA procurement decision must include support and evidence
Support stronger than evidenceBalanced candidatesWeak in bothEvidence stronger than supportAcceptance-evidence score →Lifecycle-support score →Supplier ASupplier BSupplier CSupplier D, gate fail…

Read-outSupplier A: Acceptance-evidence score 4, Lifecycle-support score 3.5. Quadrant: Balanced candidates

Method and source

Illustrative GFT procurement model. Horizontal position combines reproducible-run, physical-test dossier and data-export ratings with weights of 50, 30 and 20 percent. Vertical position combines site response and parts, maintenance and consumables, and training ratings with respective weights of 50, 30 and 20 percent. Ratings are invented to demonstrate scoring and are reconciled in the worked example. Supplier D fails a mandatory physical gate and is disqualified despite high weighted positions. No real supplier, quotation or performance is represented.

Unit: illustrative weighted score from 0 to 5. Status: illustrative. Sources: S11, S15, S18, S21, S31. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

Read this exhibit in its chapter ↗
4.3 · Introduction · paragraph 1 of 6

Colour accuracy fails operationally if the right shade lands at the wrong scale, orientation or seam position. Prepress translates visual artwork into a dimensionally locked production file mapped onto valid sewing patterns.[S09][S32] Scaling a graphic arbitrarily to fit an avatar or cropping without seam allowances and shrinkage rules distorts the assembled garment.

Research on computational and parametric pattern making confirms that a realistic three-dimensional garment model depends on valid two-dimensional pattern geometry, including seam correspondence, darts, grainlines and ease.[S09][S32] For all-over or engineered prints, prepress must map against released two-dimensional patterns rather than painting a mesh without unwrap checks, preventing motifs from stepping across side seams.[S09][S32]

GFT proposes a mandatory prepress lock checklist before any file enters the raster image processor (RIP):

  • Locked physical dimensions and resolution: Specify width, height and repeat pitch in millimetres at the print plane alongside pixel density, prohibiting automatic driver scaling.[S21]
  • Grainline and print direction: Fix pattern orientation relative to warp or wale direction, since rotating a panel alters stretch and directional reflectance.[S02][S09]
  • Seam allowance and bleed: Extend background colour and motifs across the full seam allowance plus a cutting bleed margin to prevent white seam flashing.[S09][S32]
  • Registration and piece markers: Place alignment marks and piece codes outside the finished boundary for accurate cutting and sewing.[S09]
  • Graded placement rules: Define whether motifs scale across graded sizes or keep fixed dimensions relative to an anatomical landmark.[S32]
  • Directional shrinkage compensation: Apply measured length and width contraction factors from the material passport only when backed by repeatable test data on that fabric and curing route.[S12][S27]

For garment decoration on ready-made blanks via DTG or DTF, prepress placement faces a different constraint: the garment is already sewn, and seam thickness, collar ribbing and tubular tolerances vary across pieces.[S15][S30] Prepress must define platen size, neck-seam stop, vertical offset from the collar seam and maximum printable width clearing armhole seams across the ordered size range.[S15] Printing an oversized graphic designed on a large avatar onto a small blank without a size-specific check forces the operator either to shrink the graphic arbitrarily at the console or to print over raised seams, causing ink pooling, head strikes or poor transfer adhesion.[S15][S30]

Interlude · the cloth half-woven

4 exhibits carry this chapter's argument.

Woven: sections 4.0 to 4.3Still to weave: 4.4 to 4.7

  1. 14The colour chain contains several controlled transformsLayers
  2. 15A strike-off record makes approval reproducibleRegister
  3. 16Colour, sharpness and durability need separate evidenceSmall multiples
  4. 17Substitution risk depends on what changedControl map
Hover or focus an exhibit to light its weft; select it to jump to it.

4.42 min · 7 paragraphs · 1 exhibit

Profiles belong to a controlled process state

Between the locked artwork file and the finished cloth lies a sequence of mathematical and physical transformations. Colour management connects these stages through International Color Consortium (ICC) profiles and RIP calibration tables. As the ICC specification overview states, "The ICC specification defines the file format for profiles that connect between colour encodings."[S0401] In a textile printing line, however, an ICC profile is valid only for the exact physical process state measured when the characterization chart was printed and cured.[S21][S0401]

Many small print shops treat a downloaded printer profile as a permanent software plugin, assuming that selecting "cotton" in a menu guarantees accurate output. The International Color Consortium explicitly warns against unverified reliance on general library profiles: "The ICC is unable to recommend profiles for particular applications, and accepts no responsibility for the performance of these profiles."[S0402] In digital textile production, changing the base fabric lot, liquid pretreatment concentration, printhead resolution, pass count, ink drop limit or thermal curing profile alters the physical relationship between device ink signals and reflected spectral colour.[S01][S15][S30] Once any of those variables shifts, the stored profile describes a process that no longer exists.

¶ 02 · 4 sources

S0402S01S15S30

The illustrative architecture in Exhibit 14 separates the colour chain into three governed layers: digital preparation and preview, rasterisation and ink deposition, and chemical-thermal fixation and verification. Every layer contains specific state variables that must remain locked together for a profile and strike-off approval to hold.[S14][S21][S22]

¶ 03 · 3 sourcesExhibit 14

S14S21S22

As Exhibit 14 shows, the middle and lower layers are where textile workflows diverge from office paper printing. Fogra's ProcessStandard Digital framework describes process reliability in digital printing through defined interfaces, target values, tolerances and run-length consistency checks.[S21] Adapting that discipline to a local workshop means treating the RIP configuration and finishing line as a coupled recipe. While Exhibit 14 maps control points conceptually, physical testing on the chosen cloth is still required to confirm shade gamut coverage.[S01][S21]

¶ 04 · 2 sourcesExhibit 14

S21S01

GFT proposes that a production colour profile record bind six parameters into an immutable recipe identifier before generating a strike-off:

¶ 05
  1. Artwork working space and rendering intent: State embedded source space, rendering intent and spot-colour channel mapping.[S22][S0401]
  2. RIP version, screening and ink limits: Record RIP build, screening algorithm, resolution, pass mode, carriage direction and channel or total ink limits.[S21]
  3. White underbase policy (for dark DTG or DTF): Specify choke distance, underbase density percentage, flash sequence and white ink agitation state.[S15][S30]
  4. Ink set and batch provenance: Log ink chemistry class, manufacturer, formulation code, lot numbers and expiry dates.[S01][S23]
  5. Substrate passport and pretreatment recipe: Link to a material passport ID, recording solution code, dilution, applied mass per area and drying state.[S01][S30]
  6. Thermal fixation or wet-finishing state: Specify curing equipment, dwell time, measured fabric surface temperature and any washing sequence.[S01][S15][S17]

Thermal curing belongs inside the profile state because colour development and binder film formation occur during fixation.[S01][S15] Under-curing leaves uncrosslinked binder that causes wash failure, while over-curing yellows cotton or shifts sensitive pigments.[S15][S17]

¶ 01 · 3 sources

S01S15S17

4.52 min · 7 paragraphs · 1 exhibit

A strike-off is an approval object

When a digital profile and prepress file are ready, the factory produces a physical strike-off on the production substrate using the intended recipe. Informal workshops often treat a strike-off as a loose scrap viewed under ceiling tubes, approved verbally and misplaced before production. GFT argues that a strike-off creates operational security only when governed as a numbered approval object inside the quality system.[S02][S21]

Before order release, a strike-off gives the buyer and technical lead tangible proof of shade, sharpness, hand feel and fabric interaction under agreed lighting.[S02][S21] During production and post-delivery review, a retained master portion serves as the physical reference for first-article checks and dispute resolution.

¶ 02 · 2 sources

S02S21

GFT recommends cutting every strike-off large enough to divide into matched parts marked with the same identifier: one dispatched to the buyer, one master reference archived in a dark, dry envelope at the factory, and one specimen reserved for wash and rub fastness checks.[S10][S11][S12] Cured swatches should rest and condition before evaluation so temporary thermal dye shifts stabilise.[S14][S17]

¶ 03 · 5 sources

S10S11S12S14S17

The illustrative structure in Exhibit 15 defines the mandatory fields GFT proposes for every strike-off approval event.[S02][S11][S21]

¶ 04 · 3 sourcesExhibit 15

S02S11S21

Exhibit 15RegisterillustrativeA strike-off record makes approval reproducible
Record field
Strike-off ID and date
Required content
Unique specimen code, iteration number and timestamp
Control purpose
Prevents mixing rejected trials with final approved swatch

Read-outRecord field: Strike-off ID and date. Required content: Unique specimen code, iteration number and timestamp. Control purpose: Prevents mixing rejected trials with final approved swatch

Open the full register (8 rows)
Strike-off ID and dateUnique specimen code, iteration number and timestampPrevents mixing rejected trials with final approved swatch
Material passport and lotFabric or blank code, supplier lot and pretreatment log IDLocks approval to the exact physical substrate state
Artwork and prepress hashDesign version, compensated dimensions and RIP profile IDEnsures bulk run uses the identical rasterised file
Print and cure recipePrinter ID, ink lot numbers, pass mode, cure temp and timeCaptures thermal and chemical fixation conditions
Viewing and illuminant stateLight booth illuminant, secondary light and observer angleControls metamerism and ambient lighting bias
Instrumental readingSpectrophotometer geometry, backing and colour coordinatesProvides objective drift reference for production runs
Care and rub test linkLinked wash, dry and rubbing test report identifiersPrevents releasing a shade that fails in use
Buyer decision and scopeApproved, rejected or conditional with named authorityEstablishes enforceable release permission for the lot
Method and source

Illustrative GFT strike-off register template based on digital print process control (S21), colorimetric measurement conditions (S14), textile printing durability requirements (S02) and rubbing fastness scopes (S11). Example entries are illustrative structure definitions, not records from a GFT operation.

Unit: governed approval fields. Status: illustrative. Sources: S02, S11, S14, S21. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

Each row in Exhibit 15 addresses an operational ambiguity. The table records both visual viewing conditions and instrumental metadata without assuming that every workshop owns a spectrophotometer from day one.[S14][S21] Recording primary and secondary light-booth illuminants forces a check for metamerism before sign-off, while recording instrument geometry, aperture, UV state and specimen backing prevents translucent jersey readings from shifting with table colour.[S14]

¶ 01 · 2 sourcesExhibit 15

S14S21

A fresh strike-off cannot prove durability, however. End-use performance depends on how the colourant-binder-fibre system withstands washing and abrasion.[S02] Unfixed surfactant on a fresh pigment or DTG print can make dark shades look richer before washing than after laundering, while reactive prints require complete scouring of unfixed dye before true shade evaluation.[S01][S02]

¶ 02 · 2 sources

S02S01

Note

4.62 min · 8 paragraphs · 1 exhibit

Colour difference and fastness answer different questions

A frequent mistake in digital apparel proposals is treating a single colorimetric difference number (such as $\Delta E$) as a complete measure of print quality. Colorimetric difference and colour fastness measure different physical phenomena, use different instruments and protect against different customer failures.[S10][S11][S14]

Colorimetric evaluation compares spectral reflectance or tristimulus coordinates against a target under stated illumination and observer conditions.[S14] It asks how closely a solid patch matches the reference shade right now. Even within that question, an unqualified numerical limit is meaningless without its formula and measurement geometry, and point spectrophotometers can report large variation on textured or micropatterned cloth simply from yarn crossover positioning.[S14][S21]

¶ 02 · 2 sources

S14S21

Colour fastness measures resistance to change or transfer when the printed textile faces physical or chemical stress during care and wear.[S10][S11] Public catalogue scopes of International Organization for Standardization standards illustrate why separate checks are required:

¶ 03 · 2 sources

S10S11

  • Laundering colour fastness (ISO 105-C06:2010): Evaluates colour resistance to domestic and commercial washing, assessing shade change and adjacent multifibre staining. Its scope cautions, "Industrial and hospital articles may be subjected to special laundering procedures which may be more severe in some aspects."[S10]
  • Rubbing colour fastness, or crocking (ISO 105-X12:2016): Evaluates surface colour transfer by rubbing: "Two tests may be made, one with a dry rubbing cloth and one with a wet rubbing cloth."[S11]
  • Domestic washing and drying procedures (ISO 6330:2021): Specifies testing procedures where "A complete test consists of a washing and drying procedure," because drying routes alter shrinkage and surface fibrillation.[S12]
List · 3 sources

S10S11S12

Consider a dark pigment or DTG print on cotton jersey.[S01][S15] If heavy ink is passed through a fast dryer belt, the surface may feel dry and match the colorimetric target closely, yet under the wet rubbing protocol of ISO 105-X12:2016 uncrosslinked binder and cotton fibrils transfer dark staining onto the rubbing cloth.[S11]

¶ 04 · 3 sources

S01S15S11

The illustrative layout in Exhibit 16 separates initial shade match, line sharpness, wash retention and dry/wet rubbing into distinct panels.[S10][S11][S12] All values are illustrative indices constructed to show how failure modes diverge, not measured results.

¶ 05 · 3 sourcesExhibit 16

S10S11S12

Exhibit 16Small multiplesillustrativeColour, sharpness and durability need separate evidence
Trial A: Uncured heavy pigment5Initial…4Line sh…2Wash re…3Dry rub1Wet rubTrial B: Low-pretreat DTG2Initial…2Line sh…2Wash re…4Dry rub4Wet rubTrial C: Qualified recipe4Initial…4Line sh…4Wash re…4Dry rub4Wet rub

Read-outInitial shade: Trial A: Uncured heavy pigment 5, Trial B: Low-pretreat DTG 2, Trial C: Qualified recipe 4 (illustrative readiness index (0 to 5))

Method and source

Illustrative GFT multi-criteria evaluation layout informed by ISO 105-C06 laundering scope (S10), ISO 105-X12 dry and wet rubbing scope (S11), ISO 6330 washing and drying scope (S12) and ISO 13655 colorimetry (S14). Values are invented illustrative profiles showing how a candidate trial can score high on initial colour match while failing wet rub or aftercare appearance; not empirical measurements.

Unit: illustrative readiness index (0 to 5). Status: illustrative. Sources: S10, S11, S12, S14. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

In Exhibit 16, illustrative Trial A achieves a high initial shade match (index 5) and line sharpness (index 4), but poor binder fixation causes wash retention (index 2) and wet rubbing (index 1) to fail.[S01][S11] In illustrative Trial B, low DTG pretreatment prevents wet rubbing transfer (index 4), but ink wicks into the yarn core and dulls initial shade (index 2) and sharpness (index 2).[S15][S30] Only illustrative Trial C balances all five criteria. A local factory must populate its release register with actual laboratory grades agreed for each product family.

¶ 01 · 4 sources

illustrative Trial A achieves a high initial shade match (index 5) and line sharpness (index 4)S01, S11 · illustrative

Exhibit 16

S01S11S15S30

GFT recommends specifying three rules in each technical pack rather than inventing a universal Delta E or fastness grade: 1. Solid shades versus micropatterns: Apply instrumental tolerances (with stated formula, illuminant, observer and backing) only on designated solid control patches, evaluating complex motifs visually against the master strike-off in a light booth.[S14][S21] 2. Product-specific care and rubbing schedule: Align laundering and drying conditions with end use under ISO 105-C06:2010 and ISO 6330:2021, and require both dry and wet rubbing under ISO 105-X12:2016, verifying current standard editions at contracting.[S10][S11][S12] 3. Compound-defect hold rule: Place the recipe on hold if any required fastness or aftercare check fails, regardless of fresh shade accuracy.[S02][S11]

¶ 02 · 6 sources

evaluating complex motifs visually against the master strike-off in a light booth. 2S14, S21

S14S21S10S11S12S02

4.73 min · 8 paragraphs · 1 exhibit

Material substitutions must reopen the right decisions

Step 1 of 5Minor motif resize

Exhibit 17 · illustrativeSubstitution risk depends on what changed

Prepress checkColour profileStrike-off shadeWash and rub testChemical MRSL re…Minor motif resize30100New lot, same fabric11211Alternate blank brand33332Ink or pretreat change03333Cure temp or time shift12230
Prepre…Colour…Strike…Wash a…Chemic…Minor motif resi…30100New lot, same fa…11211Alternate blank…33332Ink or pretreat…03333Cure temp or tim…12230

Minor motif resize

Minor motif resize: Prepress check 3, Colour profile 0, Strike-off shade 1, Wash and rub test 0, Chemical MRSL review 0 (illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3)) · illustrative

Supply disruptions, price changes and urgent deadlines create constant pressure to substitute inputs: switching blank brands, accepting a new bleach lot, buying third-party ink or transfer powder, or speeding up a dryer conveyor.

New lot, same fabric

New lot, same fabric: Prepress check 1, Colour profile 1, Strike-off shade 2, Wash and rub test 1, Chemical MRSL review 1 (illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3)) · illustrative

Alternate blank brand

Alternate blank brand: Prepress check 3, Colour profile 3, Strike-off shade 3, Wash and rub test 3, Chemical MRSL review 2 (illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3)) · illustrative

Ink or pretreat change

Ink or pretreat change: Prepress check 0, Colour profile 3, Strike-off shade 3, Wash and rub test 3, Chemical MRSL review 3 (illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3)) · illustrative

Cure temp or time shift

Cure temp or time shift: Prepress check 1, Colour profile 2, Strike-off shade 2, Wash and rub test 3, Chemical MRSL review 0 (illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3)) · illustrative

The method behind it: Substitution hold and requalification protocol.

Method and source · Exhibit 17

Illustrative GFT change-control matrix informed by ink-substrate dependencies (S01), ISO 6330 care testing scope (S12), Fogra digital print process control (S21) and ZDHC MRSL chemical input management (S23). Scale: 0 = no new check, 1 = operator spot check, 2 = technical lead re-test, 3 = mandatory order hold and full requalification. Scores are normative GFT control rules, not empirical defect rates.

Unit: illustrative re-verification level (0 to 3). Status: illustrative. Sources: S01, S12, S21, S23. Illustrative figures are teaching examples, not measured factory results.

4.7 · the bodyExhibit 17 above; its figures are illustrative where marked.

Supply disruptions, price changes and urgent deadlines create constant pressure to substitute inputs: switching blank brands, accepting a new bleach lot, buying third-party ink or transfer powder, or speeding up a dryer conveyor.[S15][S17] Under GFT's governance model, any change to the qualified material, chemical or thermal state is a formal engineering change event that reopens the specific verifications affected.[S01][S21][S23]

Chemical input governance is essential when evaluating alternative inks, pretreatments or adhesives. Finished-garment fastness tests do not show whether a formulation introduced restricted hazardous substances into the workplace or wastewater.[S17][S23] The ZDHC Manufacturing Restricted Substances List (MRSL) governs input formulations: "It establishes which ones to avoid, in particular those banned from intentional use."[S23] Similarly, while laboratory research explores binder-free pigment inks for untreated cotton because "Additional chemical treatment generates a large amount of wastewater and complicates the process," a factory cannot adopt a novel or substitute chemistry without verifying both safety documentation and durability on the target cloth.[S24]

¶ 02 · 3 sources

S17S23S24

The illustrative matrix in Exhibit 17 maps five production changes against five verification gates on an illustrative severity scale from 0 (no re-check) to 3 (mandatory hold and full requalification).[S01][S12][S21][S23]

¶ 03 · 4 sourcesExhibit 17

S01S12S21S23

Reading across Exhibit 17 shows how targeted holds match verification effort to physical risk:

  • Minor motif resize on the same fabric and recipe: Requires an illustrative level 3 prepress scale check and level 1 first-article visual check, leaving profile, fastness and chemical review unchanged (illustrative level 0).[S09][S21]
  • New lot of the same specified fabric: Triggers a material passport baseline and control-wedge check (illustrative level 1 to 2) to catch brightener, shrinkage or pH drift.[S14][S21]
  • Alternate blank brand or fabric construction: Triggers an illustrative level 3 hold across prepress shrinkage, profiling, strike-off and fastness, plus level 2 supplier chemical review.[S01][S12][S15]
  • Ink, pretreatment or adhesive powder change: Triggers an illustrative level 3 hold on profiling, strike-off, wash/rub durability and MRSL chemical input screening.[S01][S23][S24]
  • Curing temperature or dwell shift: Requires illustrative level 3 wash and rub re-testing and level 2 shade and shrinkage checks to confirm complete fixation without scorching.[S01][S12][S17]

Linking material passports, conditional screen previews, compensated prepress files, state-locked colour profiles, physical strike-offs and substitution holds completes the first half of Part II's accountability chain. A local apparel operation enforcing these controls knows which physical fabric, chemical recipe and thermal state produced an approved colour sample. The next chapter applies the same engineering discipline to three-dimensional garment geometry: building accountable sewing patterns and representative body avatars so virtual fit review rests on measured physical foundations.

¶ 05

Check the record

The chapter keeps its sources within reach.

Every knot is a source this chapter cites; select one to read its record, or filter the register by grade. Publication dates and inherited-source limits stay explicit. Read the paper's full evidence summary.

20 sources · 197 citation marks on this pageMost cited: S01, 25 times

Grade AGrade BGrade CKnot size: citations on this page

All 20 records shown

R06 · Grade C · inherited record

Cameroon Trade Hub

Inherited evidence R06

About 95 percent of cotton fibre exported raw against 5 percent processed locally; industrialisation target of 50 percent local processing.

Publication date unrecorded. Inherited source-text record. The original publication has not been independently reopened for this web edition.

Chapter source notes

S01 Society for Imaging Science and Technology. 2021.

S02 Wiley, Coloration Technology. 2024-01-29.

R06 Cameroon Trade Hub. Publication date unrecorded; inherited source-text check.

R07 Ecofin Agency. Publication date unrecorded; inherited source-text check.

S12 International Organization for Standardization. 2021.

S15 Epson United Kingdom. n.d..

S21 Fogra Research Institute for Media Technologies. n.d..

S30 Epson America. n.d..

S14 International Organization for Standardization. 2017.

S27 International Organization for Standardization. 2011.

S17 International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. 2007-04-30.

S22 International Color Consortium. n.d..

S0401 International Color Consortium. n.d..

S09 arXiv, Pietroni and co-authors. 2022.

S32 arXiv, Korosteleva and Sorkine-Hornung. 2023-06-06.

S0402 International Color Consortium. n.d..

S23 ZDHC Foundation. n.d..

S10 International Organization for Standardization. 2010.

S11 International Organization for Standardization. 2016.

S24 American Chemical Society, Langmuir; author abstract hosted by PubMed. 2023-04-18.

Keep the thread · chapter 04 of 14

Chapter 05 picks up the thread.

Move the shuttle along the rack to preview any chapter: its sections, exhibits and reading time. Draft web edition. This research is not investment, legal or tax advice; illustrative models are not measured factory results.

The paper's rack · 14 boltsBolt length: reading time

05Part II: Make the digital sample physically accountable

Digital sampling starts with valid patterns and representative bodies

A technical digital sample needs accountable pattern geometry, body measurements and construction intent.

  • 5.1A visual concept does not define a garment
  • 5.2The technical pack is the release contract
  • 5.3Body measurements need repeatable definitions
  • 5.4A convenient avatar may exclude the intended wearer
Reading time
23 min
Exhibits
4
Sections
7
Continue to chapter 05
← Previous: chapter 03, Fibre and order geometry determine the print routeContinue the threadChapter 05 · Digital sampling starts with valid patterns and representative bodies

Find a thread.

Type to search.